Editorial & AI Policy

Last updated: August 8, 2026

In short: Two kinds of content live on this site — member reviews (written by real people about their own experience) and editorial content (overviews, pros & cons, "best for" — written by our team with AI assistance from public information). They're always labeled so you can tell them apart. AI is never used to write fake reviews. Money never buys a better rating or ranking.

1. CommunityReviewer is independent

CommunityReviewer is not affiliated with Skool or with any community listed on the Site. We list communities because they exist and people search for them — not because anyone paid to be listed. Listing is free and does not require the owner's permission, the same way a restaurant appears on a review site without asking to be there.

2. The two kinds of content — and how to tell them apart

Member reviews appear in the "Member Reviews" section with a star rating, the reviewer's display name, and their membership status. These are written by users, moderated under our Review Guidelines, and are the opinions of their authors.
Editorial content — community overviews, pros and cons, "who is this best for" — carries a visible label such as: "Editorial assessment drafted with AI assistance from publicly available information — not based on member reviews."

3. How editorial content is made (including our use of AI)

We use artificial-intelligence tools to help research and draft editorial content from publicly available information: the community's own public page, its published pricing, the creator's public materials, and similar sources. Drafts are reviewed by a human before publication.

What we will never use AI for:

Writing or fabricating member reviews, testimonials, or quotes.
Inventing member experiences, ratings, or popularity metrics.
Presenting machine-generated content as a firsthand human experience.

Editorial pros and cons are our good-faith assessment from public information. Once a community accumulates enough member reviews, we may additionally summarize what members actually praise and criticize — and that summary will be labeled as coming from member reviews.

4. Corrections

Pricing and community details change often. If anything on a profile is out of date or wrong, community owners and anyone else can email corrections@communityreviewer.com. We correct verified factual errors promptly.

5. How ratings are calculated

A community's rating is the average of its published member reviews, shown to one decimal place.
Communities with very few reviews display their rating but are excluded from "Top Rated" or "Best of" lists until they reach a minimum review count.
Reviews removed for guideline violations are excluded from the average.
If our methodology changes (for example, weighting by review count or recency), we will update this page before the change takes effect.

6. Money never changes ratings

CommunityReviewer earns revenue from affiliate commissions on some outbound links (see our Affiliate Disclosure Ownership Disclosure) and may in the future offer paid profile features to community owners. None of this — not affiliate status, not paid features, not any partnership — can:

Increase a community's rating.
Improve a community's position in rankings or "best of" lists.
Remove, hide, or bury negative reviews.

Paid features, if offered, buy presentation (more media, more detail on a profile) — never placement or scores. Any sponsored or paid placement, if ever introduced, will be clearly labeled as such.

7. Ownership disclosures

Where CommunityReviewer's founder has a financial interest in a community that appears on this site, it is recorded here.

The Facebook Ads Blueprint — operated by CommunityReviewer's founder. It appears on our Meta ads community comparison.

Communities in which we hold an interest are assessed against the same criteria as every other listing, and are never exempt from criticism, member reviews, or removal from a recommendation.

8. Contact

corrections@communityreviewer.com